GlobalView

Showing items 1 - 6 of 6.

Add to Quick Collection   All 6 Results

  • First
  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next
  • Last
Sort:
 Add All Items to Quick Collection
Date: 2012
Language: eng
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1051892
Description: Objective: To describe the change in pain and distress over time to demonstrate the effectiveness of the QUICATOUCH program in an outpatient oncology population. Methods: Descriptive study of the firs... More
Reviewed: Reviewed
Date: 2011
Language: eng
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/936290
Description: Purpose: To evaluate caregivers’ experience of oncology services for ambulatory patients and to develop a short instrument (FAMCARE-6) suitable for computerised administration in the clinical setting.... More
Reviewed: Reviewed
Date: 2011
Language: eng
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/940036
Description: Objective: This analysis sought to determine whether patient self-report measures were associated with disruption to radiation therapy sessions due to anxiety among cancer patients undergoing radiatio... More
Reviewed: Reviewed
Date: 2009
Language: eng
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/807149
Description: Objective: To improve the acceptability of screening for depression and anxiety among patients with cancer there is a need for scales that are both very short and accurate. To date no very short quest... More
Reviewed: Reviewed
Date: 2009
Language: eng
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/806844
Description: Screening oncology patients for clinically significant emotional distress is a recommended standard of care in psycho-oncology. However, principles regarding the interpretation of screening and diagno... More
Full Text: Full Text
Reviewed: Reviewed
Image Thumbnail
Date: 2008
Resource Type: journal article
Identifier: uon:5338
Description: Objectives: To examine the feasibility of a computerised assessment and to compare resulting quality of life scores among oncology carers and patients. Methods: Six hundred and twenty-two subjects (ca... More
Reviewed: Reviewed
  • First
  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next
  • Last