- Title
- Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review
- Creator
- Ben Charif, Ali; Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon; Ousseine, Youssoufa M.; Salerno, Jennifer; Markle-Reid, Maureen; Legare, France; Gogovor, Amede; Abdoulaye Samri, Mamane; Massougbodji, Jose; Wolfenden, Luke; Ploeg, Jenny; Zwarenstein, Merrick; Milat, Andrew J.; Rheault, Nathalie
- Relation
- Health Research Policy and Systems Vol. 20, Issue 1, no. 34
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5
- Publisher
- BioMed Central Ltd.
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2022
- Description
- Background: The last decade has seen growing interest in scaling up of innovations to strengthen healthcare systems. However, the lack of appropriate methods for determining their potential for scale-up is an unfortunate global handicap. Thus, we aimed to review tools proposed for assessing the scalability of innovations in health. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the COSMIN methodology. We included any empirical research which aimed to investigate the creation, validation or interpretability of a scalability assessment tool in health. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and ERIC from their inception to 20 March 2019. We also searched relevant websites, screened the reference lists of relevant reports and consulted experts in the field. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted eligible reports and assessed the methodological quality of tools. We summarized data using a narrative approach involving thematic syntheses and descriptive statistics. Results: We identified 31 reports describing 21 tools. Types of tools included criteria (47.6%), scales (33.3%) and checklists (19.0%). Most tools were published from 2010 onwards (90.5%), in open-access sources (85.7%) and funded by governmental or nongovernmental organizations (76.2%). All tools were in English; four were translated into French or Spanish (19.0%). Tool creation involved single (23.8%) or multiple (19.0%) types of stakeholders, or stakeholder involvement was not reported (57.1%). No studies reported involving patients or the public, or reported the sex of tool creators. Tools were created for use in high-income countries (28.6%), low- or middle-income countries (19.0%), or both (9.5%), or for transferring innovations from low- or middle-income countries to high-income countries (4.8%). Healthcare levels included public or population health (47.6%), primary healthcare (33.3%) and home care (4.8%). Most tools provided limited information on content validity (85.7%), and none reported on other measurement properties. The methodological quality of tools was deemed inadequate (61.9%) or doubtful (38.1%). Conclusions: We inventoried tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health. Existing tools are as yet of limited utility for assessing scalability in health. More work needs to be done to establish key psychometric properties of these tools.
- Subject
- scalability; scaling up; scaling; spread; health innovations; patient and public involvement; SDG 16; SDG 17; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1482577
- Identifier
- uon:50966
- Identifier
- ISSN:1478-4505
- Rights
- x
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 3539
- Visitors: 3528
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|