- Title
- Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in China: Evidence from Shandong Peninsula
- Creator
- Han, Lu; Lan, Kuixu; Kou, Dejian; Meng, Zehua; Feng, Jin; Maitland, Elizabeth; Nicholas, Stephen; Wang, Jian
- Relation
- Health Economics Review Vol. 14, Issue 1, no. 37
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00513-7
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2024
- Description
- Background: Recently, the endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke has made significant progress in many aspects. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is usually recommended before endovascular treatment in clinical practice, but the value of the practice is controversial. The latest meta-analysis evaluation was that the effect of EVT versus EVT plus IVT did not differ significantly. The cost-effectiveness analysis of EVT plus IVT needs further analysis. This study assesses the health benefits and economic impact of EVT plus IVT in Shandong Peninsula of China. Method: We followed a cross-section design using the Chinese-Shandong Peninsula public hospital database between 2013 and 2023. The real-world costs and health outcomes were collected through the Hospital Information System (HIS) and published references. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from the perspective of Chinese healthcare using the complex decision model to compare the costs and effectiveness between EVT versus EVT + IVT. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the economic evaluation model. Results: EVT alone had a lower cost compared with EVT + IVT whether short-term or long-term. Until 99% dead of AIS patients, the ICER per additional QALY was RMB696399.30 over the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3× gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Shandong. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis of 3 months, 1 year and long-term horizons had a 97.90%, 97.43% and 96.89% probability of cost-effective treatment under the WTP threshold (1×GDP). The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed that direct treatment costs for EVT alone and EVT + IVT were all sensitive to ICER. Conclusions: EVT alone was more cost-effective treatment compared to EVT + IVT in the Northeast Coastal Area of China. The data of this study could be used as a reference in China, and the use of the evaluation in other regions should be carefully considered.
- Subject
- cost-effectiveness; endovascular treatment; intravenous thrombolysis; acute ischemic stroke; direct treatment costs; indirect costs; SDG 3; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1509830
- Identifier
- uon:56317
- Identifier
- ISSN:2191-1991
- Rights
- x
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 347
- Visitors: 345
- Downloads: 0