Objects
Lovat, Terence, Dally, Kerry, Holbrook, Allyson, Fairbairn, Hedy. Springer Netherlands; 2021. Oral defence as a feedback mechanism in doctoral development and examination.
Friedewald, Mark, Fletcher, Richard, Fairbairn, Hedy. Lamaze International; 2005. All-male discussion forums for expectant fathers: evaluation of a model.
Holbrook, Allyson, Burke, Rachel, Fairbairn, Hedy. Routledge; 2022. Linguistic diversity and doctoral assessment: Exploring examiner treatment of candidate language.
Dally, Kerry, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy. Routledge; 2022. Supervisor perspectives on the ‘end-stage’ of the doctoral examination process.
Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terry, Kiley, Margaret, Fairbairn, Hedy. Pergamon; 2017. Evaluation and instruction in PhD examiners' reports: how grammatical choices construe examiner roles.
Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Lovat, Terry. Routledge; 2007. Examiner comment on the literature review in Ph.D. theses.
Fairbairn, Hedy, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Preston, Greg, Cantwell, Robert, Scevak, Jill. Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE); 2009. A profile of education journals.
Kiley, Margaret, Holbrook, Allyson, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy, Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian. National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU); 2018. An oral component in PhD examination in Australia: Issues and considerations.
Starfield, Sue, Paltridge, Brian, McMurtrie, Robert, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Lovat, Terry. Pergamon Press; 2015. Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners' reports on doctoral theses.
Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Lovat, Terry, Fairbairn, Hedy. Australian Council for Educational Research; 2008. Consistency and inconsistency in PhD thesis examination.
Clement, Neville, Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Kiley, Margaret, Bourke, Sid, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue, Fairbairn, Hedy, McInerney, Dennis M.. Emerald; 2015. Exploring doctoral examiner judgements through the lenses of Habermas and epistemic cognition.
Holbrook, Allyson, Dally, Kerry, Avery, Carol, Lovat, Terry, Fairbairn, Hedy. Springer; 2017. Research ethics in the assessment of PhD theses: footprint or footnote?.
Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Lovat, Terence. Routledge; 2014. The focus and substance of formative comment provided by PhD examiners.
Holbrook, Allyson, Shaw, Kylie, Fairbairn, Hedy, Scevak, Jill. Routledge; 2024. Wellbeing and doctoral candidature: the background and development of the importance to doctoral wellbeing questionnaire.
Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy. Routledge; 2015. Examiner reference to theory in PhD theses.
Lovat, Terence, Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Fairbairn, Hedy, Kiley, Margaret, Paltridge, Brian, Starfield, Sue. Tyrrell Burgess; 2015. Examining doctoral examination and the question of the Viva.
Holbrook, Allyson, Bourke, Sid, Lovat, Terence, Fairbairn, Hedy. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA); 2006. PhD thesis examination: overview report on an ARC Discovery Grant project 2003-06.